Page 1 of 9

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 03

April 2015

Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 67

The People without a Country: A Study

of Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh

Adidur Rahman; Dr. K. C. Das

1PhD. Scholar, AUDC, Diphu.

2Asso. Prof. Deptt. of Pol. Science.

AUDC, Diphu

adidurrahman7@gmail.com ; kcdas2@gmail.com

ABSTRACT- The word statelessness has long been

recognized as an important problem in

international law. Nowhere the problem of

statelessness is more acute than in South

East Asia. The Sri Lankans, Tibetan,

Afghani etc. in India, Burmese in Thailand

and in Bangladesh, Vietnamese refugees in

Cambodia and many ethnic Chinese in all

parts of South East Asia are currently

stateless and thus especially vulnerable the

same type of human rights abuses as those

suffered by the Chakmas of Arunachal

Pradesh. The Chakmas are the victims of the

partition of the country. They were

displaced from their original inhabitant and

migrated to Northeast India. They were

rehabilitated in NEFA by the Government of

India but still fighting for citizenship status.

The present paper examines the

statelessness of the Chakmas of north-east

India especially in Arunachal Pradesh. It

tries to analyze the origin of the problem of

migration of the Chakmas from Erstwhile

East-Pakistan of Chittagong Hill Tracts

(CHT) to Mizoram and Tripura and

rehabilitation in NEFA (now Arunachal

Pradesh). It examines the causes of

reactions from the Arunachali indigenous

tribes, the All Arunachal Pradesh Students

Union and from the State Government. The

paper concludes with study of the role of the

Chakma organizations, the Union

Government and the Supreme Court in their

fight for acquiring Indian citizenship status

of Chakmas.

Key Words- Chakma, Displacement,

Migration, Refugee, statelessness.

Introduction:

The migrations, refugees and statelessness

are the words which were widely used in

international spheres during the Second

World War. Since then the displacement of

people and communities has been one of the

challenges facing the statelessness of people

in different parts of the world. It obviously

renders people homeless and is being

deprived of their places of abode. In Indian

sub-continent several thousand of people

have been affected by displacement and

living a stateless refugee life after the

partition of the sub-continent. At the time of

partition of the country, the Northeast of

India is territorially organized in such a

Page 2 of 9

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 03

April 2015

Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 68

manner that ethnic and cultural specificities

were ignored during the process of

delineation of state boundaries, giving rise

to discontentment and assertion of one’s

identity. The region has experienced

massive displacement, migration and

refugee problem causing statelessness in the

wake of independence including the

Chakmas of present Arunachal Pradesh.

Methodology: The present study adopted

multi method approaches of research, which

include historical, descriptive. The primary

sources include the firsthand information

from the informants belonging Chakmas and

extensive field works. The secondary

sources such as relevant books, journals,

periodicals and various websites have also

been used in the study.

Objectives:

1. To study the process of migration and

rehabilitation in NEFA.

2. To assess the extent of opposition of the

Chakmas by the local Arunachali Tribes,

Students Organization, and the state

Governments.

3. To know the present role of the Chakma

organizations, Union Government and the

Supreme Court of India on the issue.

Concept of Statelessness - In general, a

person is referred to as a stateless person

when he does not possess the nationality of

any state. All individuals who have lost their

original nationality without having acquired

another are in fact, stateless person. He does

not possess or enjoy those rights which are

conferred to a person in international law.

Even a stateless person is not essentially

recognized a refugee with status. In order to

eliminate the position of a person from

becoming a stateless, a few attempts have

been made. The first such type of attempt

was the Convention on the Conflict of

Nationality Laws, 1930 was adopted which

provided under Article 1 that the

Contracting States agree to accord

nationality to a person born in their territory

who would otherwise be stateless. The

provision could not prove effective to solve

the problem of statelessness.

However, considering the

gravity of the problem of statelessness, the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

1948 provided under Article 15 that each

person is entitled to have nationality and

which cannot be taken or snatched

arbitrarily. Subsequently, two more

Conventions relating to the status of

stateless person was adopted. The first

Conference was convened in 1954 by the

Economic and Social Council to regulate

and improve the status of stateless persons.

The Convention defined the term stateless

person as a person who is not considered as

a national under the operation of its law. It

gave such person judicial status but no

provision was made to reduce or eliminate

statelessness. The second conference was

held in1961 and adopted a convention on the

Reduction of Statelessness. More

importantly, the convention classifies the

ways in which a person who would

otherwise be stateless can acquire or retain

nationality through an established link with

a state by birth or descent.

In addition to these, in 1996

the UN General Assembly called on United

Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Page 3 of 9

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 03

April 2015

Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 69

(UNHCR) to encourage agreement to the

two international conventions on

statelessness and to assist government with

technical and legal advice on their

nationality legislation. The efforts of the

UNHCR were commendable in this regard.

In fact, the UNHCR’s association with

stateless person is founded on the well built

links between statelessness and

displacement of the persons. For example,

(a) Displacement can be the reason of

statelessness; (b) Displacement can be a

corollary of statelessness ;(c) Statelessness

can be a barrier to the decree of refugee

problem.

Despite of all these efforts,

there are millions of stateless persons around

the world. Ten million people worldwide

have no nationality, leaving them in a legal

limbo. This was stated by the UNHCR chief

Antonio Gutierrez launching a campaign “ I

Belong” to eradicate statelessness within a

decade. He reported that, “every 10 minutes

a new stateless person is born.” describing

the situation as “absolutely unacceptable and

anomaly in the 21st century.” It may be

because the determination of nationality

question is still within the competence of

each state. The case of the Chakma refugees

who are still living a stateless life in the state

of Arunachal Pradesh may be cited here.

Migration of Chakmas- The Chakmas of

Arunachal Pradesh belong to a tribal group

which has for centuries inhabited the CHT

of Bangladesh (earlier East-Pakistan). The

aboriginal dwelling place of the Chakma

was found in CHT. Since the beginning of

the 19th century following natural calamities

and socio-political disturbances the

Chakmas were disintegrated and displaced

from their original abode and started living a

scattered refugee life in different parts of

Assam, Tripura, and Mizoram and

Arunachal Pradesh. After the partition of the

Country, the Chakmas which remained in

East Pakistan (present Bangladesh) was

displaced massively. The displacement was

caused primarily due to the construction of

the Kaptai hydroelectric project over the

river Karnaphuli in 1962 with its funding

from USAID (United States Agency for

International Development). About 40

Per cent of the best agricultural land of CHT

was submerged due to the commissioning of

this dam. The project displaced about

100,000 indigenous people comprising

about one-third of the total indigenous

Chakma people who were forced to evacuate

the designated area. Finding no shelter, the

Chakmas along with other community had

left the CHT of East Pakistan and took

shelter in India as refugee.

Rehabilitation in NEFA:-The Chakmas

migrated in a hopeless and pathetic

condition to the Mizo district of Assam and

Tripura from the CHT of erstwhile East

Pakistan. According to the Government of

India estimate, by the middle of 1964, at

least 1, 40,000 persons including Chakma

and Hajongs consisting of 2902 families had

migrated to Assam. The then Government of

Assam expressed their inability to settle

such a large number of migrants in the state

and requested for their shifting to other

places. Even the Government of Tripura did

not encourage these displaced Chakmas to

settle in the state despite request from

Chakma leaders. During that time a

suggestion was made that a substantial