Page 1 of 9

International Journal of Research (IJR)

e-ISSN: 2348-6848, p- ISSN: 2348-795X Volume 2, Issue 4, Apr. 2015

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org

Available online at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org P a g e | 606

Status of Groundwater for Drinking Purposes During Post

Monsoon- 2013 in Upper Thirumanimuttar Sub

Basin,Cauvery River South India

N. Vijayakumar1& 2, B. Gurugnanam1

, C. Nirmaladevi2 & K. Panchamin2

1 CENTRE FOR APPLIED GEOLOGY, GANDHIGRAM RURAL INSTITUTE-DEEMED UNIVERSITY, GANDHIGRAM, DINDIGUL-624 302.

2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, GOVERNMENT ARTS COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), SALEM-636007.

1vijaygeology@gmail.com,

1gurugis@yahoo.co.in,

2geonirmala93@gmail.com,

2panchamin1992@gmail.com,

For correspondence: 1

vijaygeology@gmail.com

Abstract—Water is the world’s lifeblood. Groundwater is

a vital resource for human survival at many places of

the world and it is the only available alternative source of

water. Groundwater is a hidden resource whose value

is not well understood or appreciated. The analysis of

groundwater chemical characteristics provides much

important information useful in water resources

management. Detailed knowledge of the geochemical

evolution of groundwater and assessing the water

quality status for special use are the main objective of

any water monitoring study. In the present study, the

physicochemical characteristics of groundwater of

Upper Thirumanimuttar sub basin Cauvery river

South India were assessed for its suitability for

drinking purposes. A total of 30 water samples were

collected from the wells from different parts of the

study area during post monsoon 2013 . In order to

assess the ground water quality, the water samples

were analyzed for different physico-chemical

properties, e.g., Na,K,Ca,Mg,CO3, HCO3,Cl,SO4,pH,

electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids

(TDS), total hardness (TH), total alkalinity (TA)

concentrations. The results were compared with the

standards prescribed by World Health Organization

(WHO) and Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS). All the

physicochemical parameters were found to be in the

prescribed permissible limit. From the pH values it is

clear that the ground water of the study area is

alkaline in nature and the TDS varies in between 554-

3398 mg/l, which indicates that water in the deep

aquifer is moderately hard. Hence it is suggested to

soften the groundwater water before consumption.

Keywords—Groundwater, Drinking quality,WHO,BIS,

Post monsson,Thirumanimuttar,TDS

INTRODUCTION

Water covers 78% of the earth's surface, yet water

available for human use is limited. Water is the

world’s lifeblood. Groundwater is a vital resource for

human survival at many places of the world and it is

the only available alternative source of water.

Groundwater is a hidden resource whose value is not

well understood or appreciated. The analysis of

groundwater chemical characteristics provides much

important information useful in water resources

management. Detailed knowledge of the geochemical

evolution of groundwater and assessing the water

quality status for special use are the main objective of

any water monitoring study. Based on the World

Bank, India is using groundwater resources nearly a

quarter of the world’s total consumption.

Groundwater is the primary source of drinking water

in the study area. The water resources available are

also not uniformly distributed and the changing land

use pattern and population growth and resulting

water resources development has resulted in stress in

the environment. The extraction of excessive

quantities of ground water has resulted in drying up

of wells in the study area. It is occurred mainly due to

the rapid urbanisation activities. Agricultural, urban

& industrial wastes are increasingly threatening

groundwater quality, which is likely to become more

serious issue than the quantity in coming years.

Considering the above factors the assessment of

groundwater quality for drinking purposes along the

study area (upper Thirumanimuttar sub basin) has

been done.

LOCATION OF STUDY AREA

The study area lies in the N latitudes 11 25’ and

11 40’ and E longitude 78 5’ and 78 25’ in the Survey

of India toposheet numbers 58-I/1,58-I/2,58-I/5 and

Page 2 of 9

International Journal of Research (IJR)

e-ISSN: 2348-6848, p- ISSN: 2348-795X Volume 2, Issue 4, Apr. 2015

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org

Available online at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org P a g e | 607

58-I/6 ( Map No-1). The study area mainly covers

Salem City other adjacent place viz. small towns and

villages. The Thirumanimuttar river is the main river

flowing in the study area and it is one of the minor

tributaries of river Cauvery of South India. The

Thirumanimuttar rises in the Shevaroys Hills and

Manjavadi Ghats, North East of Salem city and it

confluences with the river Cauvery at Kooduthurai in

Paramathi taluk of Namakkal district after 102 kms

journey through Salem and Namakkal Districts.

The study area is mainly covered by Archean

rocks of Charnockite, Fissile Hornblende Biotite

Gneisses. The drainage pattern in the study area

shows parallel drainage pattern, dendritic to sub

dendritic and parallel drainage Pattern.

The study area enjoys subtropical climate with

moderate humidity and temperature. The

weather is quite pleasant from November to

February and becomes very hot in March to June.

December and January are coldest months. The

minimum and maximum temperature ranges

from 20oc to 40oc respectively. The relative

humidity percentage ranges from 60%to

90%.Highest relative humidity values were

found during east- west monsoon period. The

average annual rainfall is 737.50 mm based on

12 years average (2000 to 2011) (VIJAYAKUMAR

N et al -2015).

MAP-1. STUDY AREA LOCATION MAP

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty groundwater samples were collected on Post

monsoon Season at December 2013 covering Upper

Thirumanimuttar .Water samples were collected in

pre cleaned, sterilized, polyethylene bottles of one

liter capacity as per the standard sampling

procedures .They Were then Carefully sealed and

labeled and taken for analyses .

ANALYTICAL METHODS

The collected samples were Chemically analyzed in

Soil and Water testing Labortory Salem , using

Standard Procedures. The concentration of major

cations (Na+, K+,Ca2+,Mg2+) and anions

(HCO3

-

,Cl-,NO3

-

,SO4

-) in the Water Samples were

determined by chemical analyses in Government Soils

and water testing laboratory at Seelanayakkanpatti,

Salem. The water samples were analysed for pH,

electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids

(TDS), total calcium (Ca2), magnesium (Mg2+), total

hardness (TH), sodium (Na), potassium (K+), total

alkalinity (TA), chloride (Cl-), and Sulphate

(SO4

2-).The geochemical of ground water data are

tabulated and graphically represented (Table-1)

Page 3 of 9

International Journal of Research (IJR)

e-ISSN: 2348-6848, p- ISSN: 2348-795X Volume 2, Issue 4, Apr. 2015

Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org

Available online at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org P a g e | 608

TABLE-2.WATER QULITY OF THE STUDY

AREA COMPARED WITH WHO AND BIS

STANDARDS

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

WATER QUALITY

Information on the quality of

groundwater is an important aspect of any

Hydrogeological investigation. The chemical

quality of groundwater generally varies even at

short distances. This variation may be attributed

to the variation in Hydrogeological process. In

addition to this, the chemical quality of

groundwater in an area is influenced by various

factors like geology, geomorphology, structural

and agricultural practices. Drinking water

quality the analytical results of physical and

chemical parameters of groundwater were

compared with the standard guideline values as

recommended by the World Health

Organization(WHO, 2011) for drinking and

public health purposes and BIS(2012) (Table 2)

HYDROGEN ION CONCENTRATION (pH)

S

N

O LOCATION SAR Na% TDS EC pH TH RC

1 VYSYA COLLEGE 0.97 13.70 1682 2700 7.5 1165 -12

2 SUKKAMPATTY 4.30 42.67 1921 3000 7.5 860 -5.8

3 SENKATTUR 0.60 10.00 1231 1800 7.9 810 -3.9

4 KOOTATHUPATTY 0.55 8.57 1310 2100 7.6 960 -10

5 KARUMAPALAYAM 0.77 10.00 1689 2900 7 1305 -20

6 RAMALINGAPURAM 0.78 15.38 871 1300 7.3 550 -4.2

7 ERUMAPALAYAM 0.74 12.92 1438 2400 7.7 1045 -13

8 PANAMARATHUPATTY 0.53 13.33 626 900 8.1 390 -1.2

9 KURALNATHAM 0.98 19.00 1367 2000 8 810 -3.9

10 VETRI VIKAS SCHOOL 0.92 13.08 1572 2600 7.1 1130 -15

11 VEERAPANDI 0.92 10.71 2468 4200 7.2 1875 -25

12 CHINNASEERAGAPADI 0.86 19.17 822 1200 7.5 485 -2.7

13 KONDALAMPATTY 0.63 9.29 1652 2800 7.8 1270 -18

14 PARAPPATTY 0.95 13.49 1784 2900 7.9 1270 -14

15

KONDAPPANAYAKKANPATT

Y 0.72 16.67 634 900 7.9 375 -0.4

16 REDDIYUR 0.73 15.00 792 1200 7.5 510 -3.9

17 ARABI COLLEGE 0.41 11.00 658 1000 7.5 445 -3.4

18 SOORAMANGALAM 0.42 7.78 1176 1800 7.6 830 -7.1

19 THALAVAIPATTY 0.56 10.00 1041 1600 7.9 720 -5.6

20 MURUNGAPATTY 0.16 4.62 834 1300 7.8 620 -6.6

21 ELEMPILLAI 0.59 12.31 876 1300 8.2 570 -4.2

22 KATTUR 6.15 44.44 3398 5400 7.5 1500 -18

23

GOVERNMENT ARTS

COLLEGE 0.84 14.38 1061 1600 7.1 685 -4.7

24 ANDAGALUR GATE 7.64 52.83 3256 5300 7.3 1250 -19

25 GURUSAMIPALAYAM 0.82 11.07 1642 2800 7.9 1245 -15

26 VAIYAPAMALAI 0.96 15.00 1689 2600 7.7 1105 -11

27 KUPPICHIPALAYAM 1.16 14.64 1737 2800 7.6 1195 -13

28 ELACHIPALAYAM 5.14 43.57 2675 4200 7.7 1185 -9.2

29 ELIMEDU 0.96 21.11 554 900 8.1 355 -1.5

30 KUMARAMANGALAM 3.52 35.41 1572 3400 7.8 1100 -9

31 MAXIMUM 7.64 52.83 3398 5400 8.2 1875 0.4

32 MINIMUM 0.16 4.62 554 900 7 355 25.4

Consti

tuents

Post

monsoon-(2013)

WHO (2011)

GUIDELINES BIS -IS 10500 (2012)

Min Max Ave

rage

Highes

t

Desira

ble

Limit

Maximum

Permissible

Limit

Highest

Desirable

Acceptabl

e Limit

Maximum

Permissible

Limit

pH

7 8.2 7.6 7 - 8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5

No

relaxation

EC

μS/cm 900 5400 2363 1000 1400 1000 2000

TDS

mg/l 554 3398 1468 600 1000 500 2000

Ca

mg/l 20 421 155 75 200 75 200

Mg

mg/l 47 325 130 30 150 30 100

Na

mg/l 9 621 113 50 200 200 400

K mg/l 4 39 13 10 12 - -

HCO3

mg/l 281 866 523 - 300 - -

CO3

mg/l 0 30 7

- - - -

SO4

mg/l 5 394 57 250 400 200 400

Cl

mg/l 57 1378 470 250 300 250 1000