Page 1 of 17
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 04 Issue 04
April 2018
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 66
Conventional And Discounted Cash Flow Appraisal Techniques In Infrastructure
Investment Decision
By
Balogun Olayemi Oluwayemisi
Department of Estate Management
Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
And
Araloyin Funmilayo Moyinola
Department of Estate Management
Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
Abstract
The decision to invest in infrastructure is one that demands a well thought out plan on how to
ensure the success of such an investment decision, owing to the capital intensive nature of such
investment. A number of appraisal techniques (for instance the conventional and the discounted
cash flow appraisal techniques) have been identified to aid investment decision. This paper seeks
to identify to which extent the conventional and the discounted cash flow appraisal techniques
gives accurate appraisal of infrastructure investment decision by discussing the characteristics
and risks associated with infrastructure assets in relation to the strength and weakness of each
investment appraisal techniques. The study found out that no one of the appraisal techniques (i.e.
the conventional and the discounted cash flow) is efficient enough to fully appraise infrastructure
investment. As such, a combination of both the conventional and the discounted cash flow
methods of investment appraisal are adjudged to be suitable in the appraisal of infrastructure
investments. More specifically, a discounted pay back appraisal method will satisfy the objective
of using the conventional and the DCF techniques.
INTRODUCTION
Effective organizational decision making is
very germane to any business administration
(Dearlove, 1998). Apart from the many
things that business executive do, effective
decisions making is the first managerial skill
they must achieve (Drucker, 1979).
Choosing from a wide range of business
opportunities is also challenging for the
business investors (Hertz, 1964). Similarly,
Page 2 of 17
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 04 Issue 04
April 2018
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 67
a prospective investor in infrastructure
investment is also faced with the challenge
of choosing from alternative capital
investment.
Investing in infrastructure is a capital
investment owing to the fact that it is capital
intensive and thus one that demands a well
thought out plan on how to ensure the
success of such an investment decision. In
order to help the investor make the right
decisions, scholars have devised on a
number of appraisal techniques to aid in
assessing competing investments as well as
lone investment to justify their worth. There
are the conventional (traditional) methods of
appraisal techniques and the discounted cash
flow methods of investment appraisal
(Ogunba and Ajayi, 2017). There has almost
always been a tussle on which gives the
most accurate result. However, the believe
exists that the discounted cash flow
appraisal techniques give more accurate
picture of an investment than the
conventional appraisal techniques.
To this end, this paper seeks to identify to
which extent the conventional and the
discounted cash flow appraisal techniques
gives accurate appraisal of infrastructure
investment decision by discussing the
characteristics and risks associated with
infrastructure assets in relation to the
strength and weakness of each investment
appraisal techniques.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Oxford English dictionary, 2009 edition
defines infrastructure as the basic physical
and organizational structures needed for the
operation of a society or enterprise.
Infrastructure is typically defined by a
couple of authors though in different
perspectives yet in the same direction;
Fulmer (2009) sees the term to typically
refer to the technical structures that support
a society, such as roads, water supply,
sewers, electrical grids, telecommunications
and so forth, and can be defined as "the
physical components of interrelated systems
providing commodities and services
essential to enable, sustain, or enhance
societal living conditions”. Arthur &
Sheffrin (2003) define infrastructure to be
“the services and facilities necessary for an
economy to function”. Typically,
infrastructure means extensive public
systems, services, and facilities of a country
or region that are essential for productivity.
Viewed functionally, infrastructure
facilitates the production of goods and
services, and also the distribution of finished
Page 3 of 17
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 04 Issue 04
April 2018
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 68
products to markets, as well as basic social
services such as schools and hospitals; for
example, roads enable the transport of raw
materials to a factory. It can also be viewed
as the set of interconnected structural
elements that provide framework supporting
an entire structure of development. It is an
important term for judging a country or
region's development. In military parlance,
the term refers to the buildings and
permanent installations necessary for the
support, redeployment, and operation of
military forces. In real estate terms,
infrastructure is regarded as a landed
property, that is, any improvement on land
that is attached to land.
According to Mackay-Fisher (2003), the
sector tends to be separated into two broad
subsets - economic and social. Economic
infrastructure includes highways, water and
sewerage facilities, and energy distribution
and telecommunication networks whereas
social infrastructure encompasses schools,
universities, hospitals, public housing and
prisons. In an article quoted from an online
paper and journal, infrastructure is classified
as hard and soft infrastructure. Hard
infrastructure refers to the large physical
networks necessary for the functioning of a
modern industrial nation and they include:
transportation infrastructure, energy
infrastructure, water management
infrastructure, communication infrastructure,
and solid waste management. Whereas, Soft
infrastructure refers to all the institutions
which are required to maintain the
economic, health, and cultural and social
standards of a country, such as the financial
system, the education system, the health care
system, the system of government, and law
enforcement, as well as emergency services
and they include governance infrastructure,
economic infrastructure, social
infrastructure, cultural, sports and
recreational infrastructure. From the above,
infrastructure can be seen to be broadly
categorized on the basis of its nature or
function. That is, from the functional aspect,
infrastructure is sectored as being economic
or social. And from the nature aspect,
infrastructure is said to be hard or soft.
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
Maketa Investment Group (2008) defines
infrastructure as the fundamental
groundwork of basic services, facilities, and
institutions upon which a society depends.
Also, infrastructure could otherwise
represent economic, municipal, or social
infrastructure, or simply public works.
These public assets include roads, bridges,
