Page 1 of 13
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
e-ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 02 Issue 12
December 2016
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 111
Non-Rigid Object Contour Tracking via a Novel Supervised
Level Set Model
Digoju Pradeepkumar & Mrs.G.Satya Prabha
1PG Scholar, Department of ECE, SLC's Institute of Engineering and Technology, Piglipur
Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Near Ramoji Film City, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad,
Telangana
2Assosciate Professor, Department of ECE, SLC's Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Piglipur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Near Ramoji Film City, Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad, Telangana
Abstract— We present a novel approach to
non-rigid objects contour tracking in this
paper based on a supervised level set model
(SLSM). In contrast to most existing trackers
that use bounding box to specify the tracked
target, the proposed method extracts the
accurate contours of the target as tracking
output, which achieves better description of
the non-rigid objects while reduces
background pollution to the target model.
Moreover, conventional level set models
only emphasize the regional intensity
consistency and consider no priors.
Differently, the curve evolution of the
proposed SLSM is object-oriented and
supervised by the specific knowledge of the
targets we want to track. Therefore, the
SLSM can ensure a more accurate
convergence to the exact targets in tracking
applications. In particular, we firstly
construct the appearance model for the
target in an online boosting manner due to
its strong discriminative power between the
object and the background. Then, the learnt
target model is incorporated to model the
probabilities of the level set contour by a
Bayesian manner, leading the curve
converge to the candidate region with
maximum likelihood of being the target.
Finally, the accurate target region qualifies
the samples fed to the boosting procedure as
well as the target model prepared for the
next time step. We firstly describe the
proposed mechanism of two-phase SLSM for
single target tracking, then give its
generalized multi-phase version for dealing
with multi-target tracking cases. Positive
decrease rate is used to adjust the learning
pace over time, enabling tracking to
continue under partial and total occlusion.
Experimental results on a number of
challenging sequences validate the
Page 2 of 13
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
e-ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 02 Issue 12
December 2016
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 112
effectiveness of the proposed method. Index
Terms— Object tracking, level sets, curve
evolution, boosting, appearance modeling.
I. INTRODUCTION
Object tracking, which refers to the task of
generating the trajectories of the moving
objects in a sequence of images, is a
challenging research topic in the field of
computer vision. The problem and its
difficulty depend on several factors, such as
the amount of prior knowledge about the
target object and the number and type of
parameters being tracked, e.g., location,
scale, detailed contour. Although there has
been some success with building trackers for
specific object classes, Manuscript received
November 19, 2014; revised May 1, 2015
and May 26, 2015; accepted June 7, 2015.
Date of publication June 18, 2015; date of
current version July 7, 2015. This work was
supported in part by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China under Grant
61472103 and Grant 61300111 and in part
by the Key Program under Grant 61133003.
The associate editor coordinating the review
of this manuscript and approving it for
publication was Prof. Kiyoharu Aizawa.
(Corresponding author: Hongxun Yao.) The
authors are with the Department of
Computer Science and Technology, Harbin
Institute of Technology, China (e-mail:
sunxintyc@ 163.com; h.yao@hit.edu.cn;
s.zhang@hit.edu.cn; lidonghit@hit.edu.cn).
Color versions of one or more of the figures
in this paper are available online at
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. Digital Object
Identifier 10.1109/TIP.2015.2447213
tracking generic real-world objects has
remained challenging due to unstable
lighting condition, pose variations, scale
changes, view-point changes, and camera
noise etc. Early tracking methods use fixed
appearance model to describe the target,
which are unable to successfully track the
target over long time. To overcome this
drawback, some tracking algorithms try to
update the target appearance over time in an
online manner. The appearance models
adopted by these methods include histogram
subspace models [4] as well as sparse
representation models . Besides, some
researchers resort to adopting discriminative
learning methods to make the trackers easy
to distinguish the target from its
background. The methods based on boosting
and SVMs show impressive performance
and attract much attention. In contrast with
constructing two separate models for the
target and background respectively,
Page 3 of 13
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
e-ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 02 Issue 12
December 2016
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 113
classifier learning based approaches are
more inclined to seize properties of most
discrimination between them. Despite
having the promising performance, these
traditional trackers face a practical problem
that they use rectangular bounding box or
oval to approximate the tracked target.
However, objects in practice may have
complex shapes that cannot be well
described by simple geometric shapes, see
Fig. 1(a) for some examples. Since the
rectangle box used for presenting the tracked
target directly determines the samples to be
extracted in the subsequent target
appearance modeling/unpdate step, it is a
critical factor to tracking performance.
Inaccurate target presentation easily results
in performance loss due to the pollution of
non-object regions residing inside the
rectangle box. In order to better fit the object
shape, some methods adopt the scale
selection mechanism that aims to search for
the best scale that covers the target
accurately. An intuitive idea is to run the
algorithm in different scales, then select the
one maximizing the object function of the
tracking algorithm. Further, this selection
mechanism is also extended to orientation.
By simultaneously controlling both the scale
and orientation, the statistic bias for the
target distribution can be controlled, see
Fig.1(a), and this, to some extent, makes
better target description and tracking
estimation. Nevertheless, all these
scale/orientation adjustments are still based
on simple geometric shapes (such as
rectangle and oval), which will inevitably
introduce a large number of background
pixels when used for presenting real-world
object with complex shapes. Ideally, a better
manner to describe the target is to use the
accurate contour along the target’s surface.
Fig. 1. Motivation: (a) shows the typical
bounding box presentation on complex
object with scale/orientation adaption. (b)-
(g) gives some contour tracking examples of
the proposed method in various challenging
cases, whose frame numbers are 511, 14,
C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\1.png
