Page 1 of 4

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at

http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 8

August 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 418

Job Involvement of Non-Managerial level Employees: Evidence

from Ceylon Electricity Board, Sri Lanka

Praveena Thevisuthan

Lecturer, Department of Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Communication and

Business Studies, Trincomalee Campus, Eastern University, Sri Lanka

Abstract

The study aims to identify the level of job

involvement of non- managerial employees

working at the Ceylon Electricity Board in

the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka. A total

of 100 questionnaires were issued to such

employees but only 92 were answered and

made available for analysis. As per

analysis, it was found that there was a

moderate level of job involvement among

non- managerial employees. Thus the

findings provide more insight into the

ways for increasing the job involvement at

the workplace. Future researches may look

in to subject with different constructs and

in various contexts.

Key words: Job Satisfaction, Job

Engagement, Non- Managerial Employees.

1. Introduction

Job involvement is also considered as an

important behavioral aspect since it

directly links to a person’s working life

and is favourably associated with the

aspects of the job (Kanungo, 1982). Job

involvement is considered as the favorable

organizational implications which support

to achieve the organizational goals and

lead to enhance efficiency and productivity

(Brown, 1996). Job involvement is

considered as an important employee

attitude since it enhances the desired

behaviors including job satisfaction and

positive motivation (Schultz & Schultz,

1994). Also Robbins and Judge (2009)

stated that employees with a high level of

job involvement strongly identify with and

really care about the kind of work they do.

Job involvement refers to how people

perceive their jobs in relation to the

working environment, the job itself, and

how their work and life are integrated

(Hirchfeld & Field, 2000). McGregor

(1960) saw that job involvement leads to

enhanced productivity and to create work

situations which lead to better integration

of individual and organizational goals.

Providing more challenging and

demanding jobs to the employees leads to

increased productivity in the organizations.

Moreover job involvement leads to an

individual’s satisfaction while increasing

the organizational productivity (McGregor,

1960).

Even though, the construct of the job

involvement is generally tested in many

previous studies, still there is a research

gap in applying this construct to the

developing nations, especially studying job

involvement among non- managerial

employees. It is against this backdrop that

the present research aims to identify the

level of job involvement among non- managerial employees of Ceylon

Electricity Board, Sri Lanka.

Page 2 of 4

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at

http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 8

August 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 419

2. Research Methodology

2.1 Research Approach

The positivist and interpretivist approaches

were adopted for the current study in

addition to deductive approach.

2.2 Sample for the study

For the study, 100 non-managerial

employees of the Ceylon Electricity Board

in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka were

selected using stratified sampling method.

2.3 Research Instrument and Data

Collection

The researcher adopted standard research

instrument for the Job Involvement,

developed by Kanungo (1982) which

consists of 10 items. These items were

measured on a five-point Likert scale (1=

strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree).

Thus, a structured questionnaire was used

as a data collection method.

2.4 Method of Data Analysis

The study used descriptive analysis where

it used mean and standard deviation to

analyse the research data.

3. Results and Discussion

The data were analysed through SPSS

version 24.0.

As per Table 1, the non-managerial

employees perceived a moderate level of

job involvement with the mean value and

standard deviation 3.39 and 0.716

respectively.

Table 1: Mean values of job

involvement of non-managerial

employees

Items Mean Standard

deviation

1. The most important

things that happen to

me involve my

present job.

3.25 0.645

2. To me, my job is

only a small part of

who I am.

3.45 0.745

3. I am very much

involved personally in

my job.

3.25 0.584

4. I live, eat, and

breathe my job. 3.12 0.612

5. Most of my

interests are centered

upon my job.

3.58 0.675

6. I have very strong

ties with my present

job that would be very

difficult to break.

3.64 0.785

7. Usually, I feel

detached from my job. 3.48 0.594

8. Most of my

personal life goals are

job-oriented.

3.85 0.685

9. I consider my job to

be very central to my

existence.

3.34

0.746

10. I like to be

absorbed in my job

most of the time.

2.98 0.808

Overall mean and

standard deviation

3.39 0.716

Page 3 of 4

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at

http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 8

August 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 420

As per analysed data, 03 items of job

involvement were discovered as high level.

Amongst those items, the item of “Most of

my personal life goals are job-oriented”

showed the higher level of involvement

with the mean vale of 3.85. The items of “I

have very strong ties with my present job

that would be very difficult to break” and

“Most of my interests are centered upon

my job” also reached its high level of

mean values (3.64 and 3.58).

However, 07 out of 10 items of job

involvement showed the moderate level of

values. E.g. “Usually, I feel detached from

my job” showed a mean value of 3.48 and

“I like to be absorbed in my job most of

the time” recorded a mean value of 2.98.

One of the researches found that job

involvement of part time employees or

contractual employees showed lower level

of involvement than full time employees at

the workplace (Martin & Hafer, 1995).

This is an encouraging pointer to the

organizations to enhance involvement,

since it has a huge effect on other variables

such as job commitment, organizational

performance etc.

Further, job involvement involves the

internalization of values about the

goodness of work or the importance of

work in the worth of the individual

(Lodahl & Kejner, 1965). As such

individuals who display high involvement

in their jobs consider their work to be a

very important part of their lives and

whether or not they feel good about

themselves is closely related to how they

perform on their jobs

Therefore, job involvement can be

increased through the role of work and job

design (Lawler,1992 and Pfeffer,1994).

4. Conclusion and Recommendations

The study concludes that there was

moderate level of job involvement among

non- managerial level employees of the

Ceylon Electricity Board, Eastern

Province, Sri Lanka.

Since the job involvement is the

cornerstone of all individual and

organizational performance, the job

involvement of non- managerial

employees need to be increased through

proper human resource management

practices, such as providing proper role of

work, effective and acceptable job design,

ensuring autonomy, and flexibility and

empowering at the workplace. Moreover,

the organization can enhance the

dimensions of job satisfaction including

pay and benefit, supervision, the job itself,

working conditions etc.

References:

[1] Brown, S.P. (1996). A meta- analysis and review of organizational

research on job involvement.

Psychological Bulletin, 120, 235-255.

[2] Hirschfeld, R., and Field, H. 2000.

Work Centrality and Work Alienation:

Distinction Aspects of General

Commitment to Work. Journal of

Organizational Behavior 32 (7): 789-800.

[3] Kanungo, R. N. (1982).

Measurement of job and work

involvement. Journal of Applied

Psychology. 67(3), 341-349.

[4] Lawler, E.E. III. (1992.) The

Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-