Page 1 of 20

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 6

June 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 108

Internal Organizational Dynamics Shaping Public Sector

Entrepreneurship in Tanzania

Kelvin Luka Nzilano

Moshi Co-operative University

kelvin.nzilano@mocu.ac.tz

Abstract

Public sector organisations are advised to

embrace entrepreneurship because it

stimulates not only efficiency and creativity

but also transforms public organisations into

more flexible units that serve the taxpayers

more effectively. The major thrust is not to

make public sector more businesslike, rather

to enhance opportunities, to take

challengeable ideas and innovate ways to

offer more public choice and benefits.

Despite its importance, public sector

entrepreneurship has been the subject of

little research. The few available studies are

limited to few countries such as United

States, UK, Australia, New Zealand and

Greece among others. Consequently, the

field lacks sufficient results which would

allow global generalisation and formation of

universally accepted best practices. In Sub- Saharan Africa and Tanzania in particular,

there are limited data on the internal

organisational dynamics that shape public

sector entrepreneurship. This paper fills this

gap by presenting the survey results

conducted in 2014 at the Moshi Co- operative University, using 120 respondents.

The study hypothesized that internal

organizational dynamics do not significantly

influence public sector entrepreneurship

development in Tanzania. Descriptive

statistics such as mean and standard

deviation were used to measure the average

response and difference between responses.

Hypotheses were tested using independent

sample t-tests and one way analysis of

variance (ANOVA). The principal findings

revealed that internal organisational

dynamics namely work discretion, rewards

and reinforcement and organizational

boundaries significantly influence public

sector entrepreneurship development.

Management support and resource

availability had insignificance influence in

public sector entrepreneurship. Irrespective

of sex, educational level and employment

category, respondents had the same

perceptions on the internal dynamics that

shape entrepreneurship. The study

recommends that the government should

create favorable environment for

entrepreneurial practices in order to enhance

public sector organisational capacity to

respond to the ever-changing environment

more promptly and effectively.

Key words: Internal organisational

dynamics, public sector, entrepreneurship,

Tanzania.

1.0 Introduction

Globalisation and the development of

science and technology have completely

changed the business world. Currently,

Page 2 of 20

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 6

June 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 109

people have faster access to information and

receive it almost as fast as it reaches leaders

(Tubey et al., 2015). Worldwide and

Tanzania in particular, public sector is

increasingly facing pressure due to rising

costs, demand from citizens and businesses,

demographic changes, globalization and

climate and environmental concerns (Bloch

and Bugge, 2012). We are living in an era of

niche markets where customers demand

high quality products and services and have

a variety of choices (Tubey et al., 2015).

Consequently, public sector operation

should base on adaptability, flexibility,

speed, aggressiveness and innovativeness,

all described under ‘corporate

entrepreneurship’ (Morris and Kuratko,

2002). Entrepreneurship in public sector

stimulates not only efficiency and creativity

but also transforms public organizations into

more flexible units that serve the taxpayers

more effectively (Meynhardt and

Diefenbach, 2012). Public sector

entrepreneurship (PSE) is the process that

exists within public sector organizations

leading to innovative activities such as

development of new and existing services,

technologies, administrative techniques, and

new improved strategies, risk-taking and

proactivity (Kearney et al., 2009).

Essentially, PSE embraces the participation

of employees and the conscious effort to

instill entrepreneurial practices within

organizations in order to enhance firms’

ability to produce new products and services

(Morris & Kuratko, 2002). This is an

entrepreneurial behaviour exhibited fairly by

the whole organization as it involves actors

inside public sector organization (Morris,

2007).

Traditionally, entrepreneurship within

existing organization ‘corporate

entrepreneurship’ has been associated with

private sector as a source of organizational

survival and growth through increased sales,

market share, profitability and growth

potential (Kearney et al., 2009). However,

entrepreneurship holds potential to exist in

virtually all types of organizations (Zerbinati

& Suitaris, 2005). Currently, public sector

organizations experience turbulent external

environment with eroding tax bases,

heightened accountability, rapidly changing

technology and increasing diverse audiences

to serve (Bloch and Bugge, 2012). In

Tanzania, as in many developing economies,

public sector organizations depend on the

central government to finance their

operations. However, recent trend reveals a

Page 3 of 20

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 02 Issue 6

June 2016

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 110

falling central government subvention,

which endangers public service delivery.

These challenges call for entrepreneurial

behaviour within public sector

organizations. The adoption of PSE could be

a sound approach that generates alternative

revenues, improves alternative processes,

and develops innovative solutions to meet

social and economic needs (Fox, 2015).

Indeed, entrepreneurship in public sector is a

driving force of change and innovation that

opens-up innovative opportunities to achieve

efficient and effective performance (Kim,

2010).

Despite its importance, PSE has been the

subject of little research (Meynhardt and

Diefenbach, 2012). Current research has not

identified factors or practices that motivate

entrepreneurial behaviour in public sector

(Zerbinati & Suitaris, 2005). Existing

literature focus on industrial and business

corporations and little has studied the

application of entrepreneurship in other

context (Yeazdanshenas, 2014). Previous

studies are limited to few countries such as

United States, UK, Australia, New Zealand,

and Greece among others. Consequently, the

field lacks sufficient results for global

generalization and formation of universally

accepted best practices (Zampetakis &

Moustakis, 2010). Moreover, existing

analysis is confined to top management,

contrary, research suggest the importance of

entrepreneurial process to all employees

(Borins, 2002). Literature has been less clear

on which specific organisational

components influence entrepreneurship

inside organisation (Strydom, 2013). Given

the potential benefits of PSE, identifying

internal organizational dynamics that shape

entrepreneurship in public sector

organisations is very important. Previous

research has analysed psychological and

behavioral characteristics of individuals

which are insufficient to understand the very

heart of PSE (Kim, 2010). So far, there is no

agreement on which key internal

organisational dynamics are more important

in facilitating the development of

entrepreneurship inside organisation

(Hornsby et al., 2002). Indeed, this creates a

challenge for public sector managers when

attempting to promote entrepreneurial spirit

in public sector context.

In Africa and Tanzania in particular, the

environment for entrepreneurship

development particularly in public sector are

relatively not attractive. This is partly